tanabutler
Aug 12 2005, 08:44 PM
As posted elsethread, The Scream is looking for a digital camera under $200.
Canon is what I recommend most: their cameras have that nifty "Panoramic Stitch Mode" that allows you to take great (what else?) PANORAMIC shots. I am especially enamored of the
flip-out viewfinder that is on some of the cameras (the G1-6, e.g., the A80, A85, A90. A95, and the Powershot Pro 1, I think), as it allows you to get overhead and underneath shots without climbing or crawling.
PHOTO OF VIEWFINDER:

They also have built-in modes available on some models, such as Sepia, B/W, enhanced color, muted color, and more. Of course, you can change the ISO speed, shutter speed, and F-stop on all the models I've seen, which is not to say that the cheapest models have these features.
You need to consider important things like what kind of memory comes with the camera. A 16 MB card is next to useless, unless you're just shooting 640x480 for the web (which is all some people need, but not me). If you're going to print, you can do a decent 8"x10" with only 2 megapixels, but I think you need at least 3.2. And again, if you're not doing fancy printing, 3.2 megapixels is more than ample resolution for 99% of people.
Another thing to consider is the power source. Don't buy something that takes A batteries unless you are going to use rechargeables. Does the camera have an AV adapter, so you can charge its battery? That's a good thing, but not mandatory. I myself would not buy a camera that didn't allow me to recharge the battery, but that's just me.
A good place to start is eBay: look for a reputable dealer with high customer satisfaction. Be sure check out the packages: you can often get amazing deals that include extra memory, a card reader, tripods, camera case, and more.
But be sure to notice the shipping costs: they fluctuate wildly. You can avoid paying sales tax at eBay and other online dealers. Check out MySimon.com, Amazon (free shipping), and then PriceGrabber.com for comparison shopping.
Besides Canon, I recommend Olympus cameras, too. Both brands have pretty high customer satisfaction and ratings. But only Canon has those flip-out viewfinders.
Once you get an idea of a few models that interest you, go to
DPReview.com (Digital Photography Review) and do comparison charts. You can also go to
Cnet.com for recommendations.
I have owned a Canon G1, an A85, and a Powershot Pro 1. All have been wonderful (and all have the swing-out viewfinder). I've also owned two FujiFilm digital cameras, and liked them both. I had a Kodak and sent it back: just like the goldish film, the colors sucked. (We only use FujiFilm in our SLR.)
List #1 at eBay: filtered for Canon + Buy Now + New/Never Opened + U.S. Only + 3.0-3.9 Megapixels + Sorted by Lowest Price First. (Compare shipping costs on preferred models.)
List #1 at eBay: filtered for Olympus + Buy Now + New/Never Opened + U.S. Only + 3.0-3.9 Megapixels + Sorted by Lowest Price First. (Compare shipping costs on preferred models.)
A85 for under $200 (Highly recommended)
And anotherA95: brand new.
Hope that helps a little. You can find extra memory pretty darn cheap these days, and you'll need it with most cameras.
The Scream
Aug 12 2005, 08:56 PM
Thank you Tana
That helps alot. It never occured to me to shop through ebay, I've been looking on Amazon.
Blondie
Aug 12 2005, 09:30 PM
Excellent advice, Tana. I relied heavily on DPReview when I was shopping, and have been very happy with the Canon A95.
tanabutler
Aug 12 2005, 09:46 PM
Thanks, Blondie!
Whoopsies, Scream, one other bit of cautionary advice: make SURE you are not buying a refurbished camera! I see that one of the cameras I linked is refurbished. Bah!
Orik
Aug 12 2005, 09:51 PM
| QUOTE (tanabutler @ Aug 12 2005, 05:46 PM) |
Thanks, Blondie!
Whoopsies, Scream, one other bit of cautionary advice: make SURE you are not buying a refurbished camera! I see that one of the cameras I linked is refurbished. Bah! |
generally, when you see a good deal on eBay, it's refurb whether it says so or not.
tanabutler
Aug 12 2005, 10:59 PM
| QUOTE (Orik @ Aug 12 2005, 02:51 PM) |
| QUOTE (tanabutler @ Aug 12 2005, 05:46 PM) | Thanks, Blondie!
Whoopsies, Scream, one other bit of cautionary advice: make SURE you are not buying a refurbished camera! I see that one of the cameras I linked is refurbished. Bah! |
generally, when you see a good deal on eBay, it's refurb whether it says so or not.
|
I don't think so. You can't have bajillion good feedbacks and do business like that. But you can always ask the seller.
The Scream
Aug 13 2005, 12:49 AM
The digital camera I have now is such a piece of crap. I bought it off Amazon, the deal was that it's a $200 camera on sale for $50, in reality I paid 5 times more for a $10 camera.
Tamar G
Aug 13 2005, 11:58 PM
I just bought one, so a few things to consider if (like me) you want a point and shoot and you don't want anything technical:
1) how fast between when you press the button and the picture takes (if you want to get friends in candid shots, or animals outside, it should be pretty fast)
2) how fast between pictures? My camera now is great outdoors, but indoors (dark) it can take up to 4 seconds between pictures for the camera to reset and refocus.
3) Is the zoom digital or optical? Often it is a little bit of both- the first 2x is optical, and after that it's digital, or something like that. The digital part is just the camera enlarging a picture it already has, and does not improve the quality. Digital zoom will result in grainy pictures, so the optical zoom is the important part.
That's all I can think of at the moment. If you have a great camera store near you it pays to go in and talk to the people who work there. It's possible to do this and then go look a cheaper deal on the model you want on the internet, although I don't think it's right to do this. If you go the camera store route it's more expensive, but I think the advice is part of the price. (You also have a chance to actually test out cameras and get a good answer to questions 1 and 2.) For DIY research CNET is a great source.
Also, I think these days most cameras are being sold with useless memory, with the expectation that you will buy your own memory card. My camera I think came with enough internal memory to hold 8 pictures- obviously I had to buy a memory card. Something to think about with a $200 budget.
omnivorette
Aug 14 2005, 12:05 AM
So what did you end up buying, Tamar?
tanabutler
Aug 14 2005, 01:17 AM
| QUOTE (Tamar G @ Aug 13 2005, 04:58 PM) |
I just bought one, so a few things to consider if (like me) you want a point and shoot and you don't want anything technical:
1) how fast between when you press the button and the picture takes (if you want to get friends in candid shots, or animals outside, it should be pretty fast)
2) how fast between pictures? My camera now is great outdoors, but indoors (dark) it can take up to 4 seconds between pictures for the camera to reset and refocus.
3) Is the zoom digital or optical? Often it is a little bit of both- the first 2x is optical, and after that it's digital, or something like that. The digital part is just the camera enlarging a picture it already has, and does not improve the quality. Digital zoom will result in grainy pictures, so the optical zoom is the important part.
That's all I can think of at the moment. If you have a great camera store near you it pays to go in and talk to the people who work there. It's possible to do this and then go look a cheaper deal on the model you want on the internet, although I don't think it's right to do this. If you go the camera store route it's more expensive, but I think the advice is part of the price. (You also have a chance to actually test out cameras and get a good answer to questions 1 and 2.) For DIY research CNET is a great source.
Also, I think these days most cameras are being sold with useless memory, with the expectation that you will buy your own memory card. My camera I think came with enough internal memory to hold 8 pictures- obviously I had to buy a memory card. Something to think about with a $200 budget. |
Tamar, you reminded me of something else I love about the Canons I own (we still have all three cameras), thanks.
All of my Canon camera models have had a "burst" mode, which allows you to shoot in rapid-fire sequence. Depending on the resolution (640x480 will have a lot faster shots and allow more in a sequence than a higher resolution, because the camera has to has to stop and think, so to speak. Burst mode is great when you're looking for an elusive shot...the happy birthday boy when he blows out all his candles, etc. I took some great photos of my daughter playing softball and actually connecting with the ball.
No longer need you fear blowing The One Great Shot because someone's eyes are blinking.
It's a feature I don't often use, but it's great when it's needed.
FaustianBargain
Aug 14 2005, 11:49 AM
Go Canon!
FB who still prefers her canon G1 over the shiny DSLR.
johnnyd
Aug 14 2005, 02:08 PM
Hey, now!
Thanks to posts above, I have learned two new features of my already awesome Canon A85.
Farid
Aug 14 2005, 02:27 PM
I'm wondering if Tana really needs 3 cameras and if she wants to paret with one at a reasonable price,
cristina
Aug 14 2005, 03:25 PM
About a year ago I bought a digital camera on eBay. I had researched cameras on the various sites that Tana mentioned, sites that had no vested interest in selling me a camera, just in giving me information. I was about cross-eyed with doing research. The choice had come down to the Canon EOS Rebel or the camera I ultimately bought.
The seller acknowledged that it was 'slightly used', but when it arrived, I couldn't see that it had been used at all. It was definitely not refurbished. I got a steal--well, at least a very good deal--and have been happy with it ever since. Camera came with a 64mb card, a 512mb card, a card reader, and some filters, all included in the price. The only negative, after a year, is the macro function; it's unwieldy to use and the pics are usually unsatisfactory.
Before I bid on the camera, I read and was satisfied with all of the seller's feedback. I emailed the seller and asked questions, lots of questions. He answered in what seemed to me to be a straightforward, honest way--no evasions, no jargon, just said why he was selling this complicated camera. He said, "I already have a simple digital that's good enough. This fancy one was given to me, and I'm just a grandpa taking grandkid snapshots--I don't have the energy to learn how to use this thing."
The camera is the Konika Minolta Dimage A1. It's more camera than The Scream is looking for, but it has most of the features I wanted, including a pioneering anti-shake device. A year ago, it was the only digital on the market that had that feature. It's 5mp, 7X optical zoom, has burst mode, etc etc etc etc--I still haven't learned all the etcs. The photos are incredible.
It's crucial to do the footwork before plunking down the bucks. Tana, you helped me, back then (on another food site), and I can't think of a better resource than you.
tanabutler
Aug 14 2005, 04:28 PM
| QUOTE (cristina @ Aug 14 2005, 08:25 AM) |
About a year ago I bought a digital camera on eBay. I had researched cameras on the various sites that Tana mentioned, sites that had no vested interest in selling me a camera, just in giving me information. I was about cross-eyed with doing research. The choice had come down to the Canon EOS Rebel or the camera I ultimately bought.
The seller acknowledged that it was 'slightly used', but when it arrived, I couldn't see that it had been used at all. It was definitely not refurbished. I got a steal--well, at least a very good deal--and have been happy with it ever since. Camera came with a 64mb card, a 512mb card, a card reader, and some filters, all included in the price. The only negative, after a year, is the macro function; it's unwieldy to use and the pics are usually unsatisfactory.
Before I bid on the camera, I read and was satisfied with all of the seller's feedback. I emailed the seller and asked questions, lots of questions. He answered in what seemed to me to be a straightforward, honest way--no evasions, no jargon, just said why he was selling this complicated camera. He said, "I already have a simple digital that's good enough. This fancy one was given to me, and I'm just a grandpa taking grandkid snapshots--I don't have the energy to learn how to use this thing."
The camera is the Konika Minolta Dimage A1. It's more camera than The Scream is looking for, but it has most of the features I wanted, including a pioneering anti-shake device. A year ago, it was the only digital on the market that had that feature. It's 5mp, 7X optical zoom, has burst mode, etc etc etc etc--I still haven't learned all the etcs. The photos are incredible.
It's crucial to do the footwork before plunking down the bucks. Tana, you helped me, back then (on another food site), and I can't think of a better resource than you. |
Thanks, Cristina...
For me, I would not buy a used camera because of the warranty issue. I want a brand-new one, just in case. But if it works for you, that is good.
Farid, only two of the cameras are mine. The A85 is Bob's (though I picked it out), who has his own needs for it. He's a builder, and he also has a second business that requires its use a few times a year. I don't enjoy using it as the flip-out viewfinder is too small for my tastes. My Powershot Pro1 has spoiled me: its viewfinder is bigger than all of the others.
The G1 is my back-up camera, and I am reluctant to part with it since I wouldn't get much for it, and I paid $600 for it new, as well as extra money for a zoom lens and more memory. You don't really want it, even if it functions perfectly, because it's four years old, which is ancient in digital camera years.
I recently bought a set of accessories for my Powershot: filters, two tripods (including the cutest little tabletop tripod), a zoom lens, and a wide-angle lens. I got the whole kit on eBay for about $125, and it is awesome.
Johnny, glad to help. (Which features? I'm guessing burst and panoramic modes.)
FaustianBargain
Aug 15 2005, 02:24 AM
| QUOTE (tanabutler @ Aug 14 2005, 04:28 PM) |
My Powershot Pro1 has spoiled me: its viewfinder is bigger than all of the others.
The G1 is my back-up camera, and I am reluctant to part with it since I wouldn't get much for it, and I paid $600 for it new, as well as extra money for a zoom lens and more memory. You don't really want it, even if it functions perfectly, because it's four years old, which is ancient in digital camera years. |
and the pro1 has a (carl zeiss?) L series specially ground glass lens which as 'pro' as they get.
tana, the g1 is a solid, heavy metal case and the latter versions are all fibreglass or worse, plastic. dont EVER part with the g1. they dont make it like that anymore.
The Scream
Aug 15 2005, 02:37 AM
I paid over $600 for a Sony Mavica about 5 years ago. It's a piece of crap now. Actually it took very good pictures, it just died on me one day.
I like my SLR Olympus 28-120, if I could find a digital camera that can take the same quality pictures at the same speed for the same bucks I'd be happy. I know I'll save on film development with a digital. But for photos that I don't share online I prefer it.
I still have my dad's old Yashica manual SLR. He was a photographer in Korea and when we moved to the States, he splurged big time (for us back then) on it. I have the old lenses, as well some I bought on my own.
tanabutler
Aug 15 2005, 02:41 AM
QUOTE(FaustianBargain @ Aug 14 2005, 07:24 PM)
and the pro1 has a (carl zeiss?) L series specially ground glass lens which as 'pro' as they get.
tana, the g1 is a solid, heavy metal case and the latter versions are all fibreglass or worse, plastic. dont EVER part with the g1. they dont make it like that anymore.
Thank you for that good advice: I couldn't get enough for it, anyway, and I love it. It went to Italy with me.
The L-Series lens is amazing (or so I have heard from other people who actually know what they're talking about). They have it on the Olympus C-8080, too, I think, which is what my ex-husband uses for his photography.
It is an especially good camera for capturing intense colors. I really do love this camera, even if I think the people in Canon's corporate headquarters are soulless Borgs.
Tamar G
Aug 15 2005, 02:21 PM
| QUOTE (omnivorette @ Aug 14 2005, 12:05 AM) |
| So what did you end up buying, Tamar? |
I bought a
Nikon Coolpix S1. I did very little research and went to a camera store I trusted and basically took the advice of the very knowledgeable guy behind the counter. The upside is that I didn't waste any time doing research, the downside is that you may end up with a camera that is inferior to what you want.
I think that the camera was under $300 where we bought it, but I could be wrong (it was a present). I also got a large memory chip and I plan on buying an extra battery. I have enough memory so that if I took a 2 week vacation I would not have to worry about not having enough memory.
pros of this camera:
- it is the tiniest camera ever! The zoom is internal to the camera so there is no piece that protrudes when you zoom. Size was a major factor for me, which is why I ended up with this camera. Also, the street cred of having the smallest camera ever is pretty great. Never underestimate the power of street cred.
- Although it's small, the screen is larger than most digital cameras I've seen which is a big plus. Screen size is another good factor to consider.
- it has a lot of special modes (sunset, sunrise, underwater- although you would need to buy a special case to use it under water, sports mode, fireworks, panorama, portrait, scenery, etc.). These allow me to make specific adjustments to shutter speed and saturation even though it's just a fully automatic camera.
- no red eye (really, I haven't had any red eye yet)
- unbelievable close pictures (within 2 inches). Seriously, close-up pictures of flowers look better than national geographic. When I'm at home I'll post an example.
cons:
-The biggest con, and it's a big one, is that it does not take great indoor pictures and the flash takes a long time to reset. Scenery shots are amazing, but indoor party pictures are going to be a problem
If I did more research I probably would not pick this camera again, but I'm no unhappy that I got it. It does a lot of things very well, and one or two big things poorly.
Maurice Naughton
Aug 15 2005, 10:46 PM
Tana, you say, "[M]ake SURE you are not buying a refurbished camera!"
I'm assuming that by "refurbished" you mean factory rebuilt. If someone buys a camera that's DOA and returns it for replacement, it goes back to the factory. The technicians there replace the faulty component (or repair whatever has gone wrong), and then they test the hell out of it before putting it back on the market as a factory refurb. It is probably as good as if not better than a just-off-the-production-line model.
I've bought a number of factory refurbished electronic devices and have been thorougly satisfied. But that's just a point-of-view.
tanabutler
Aug 15 2005, 10:52 PM
| QUOTE (Maurice Naughton @ Aug 15 2005, 03:46 PM) |
Tana, you say, "[M]ake SURE you are not buying a refurbished camera!"
I'm assuming that by "refurbished" you mean factory rebuilt. If someone buys a camera that's DOA and returns it for replacement, it goes back to the factory. The technicians there replace the faulty component (or repair whatever has gone wrong), and then they test the hell out of it before putting it back on the market as a factory refurb. It is probably as good as if not better than a just-off-the-production-line model.
I've bought a number of factory refurbished electronic devices and have been thorougly satisfied. But that's just a point-of-view. |
Refurbished items often have only a 90-day guarantee/warranty, which is why I advised not to get one. Brand new items usually have a year-long warranty.
Maurice Naughton
Aug 15 2005, 10:54 PM
I take your point.
GG Mora
Aug 15 2005, 11:34 PM
I have a Sony DSC S75 that I bought while vacationing in San Francisco 4 years ago; the boys at Cable Car Camera gave me a sick deal on it and threw in a bunch of extras for free. Not a shabby unit at all; has a Zeiss lens and, like Tana's Canon, handles intense colors beautifully.

At some point I'd like to upgrade to a Nikon D-SLR so I can use the Nikkor lenses I bought to use with my trusty ole Nikon FM.
FaustianBargain
Aug 16 2005, 03:14 AM
one of my earliest G1 floralssale of
this covered at least 1/3 of my G1 cost.
tanabutler
Aug 16 2005, 04:13 AM
That's another thing I love about my Canon Powershot Pro1--the macro gets 1.3" inches away from the subject! I do love a good macro function.
Maurice Naughton
Aug 16 2005, 05:00 AM
The Nikon Coolpix 4800 has 400 megapixels and an awesome 8x OPTICAL zoom, equivalent to 35 - 300 mm in a 35mm film camera.. Around $350 on eBay.
Farid
Aug 16 2005, 05:03 AM
| QUOTE (Maurice Naughton @ Aug 16 2005, 05:00 AM) |
| The Nikon Coolpix 4800 has 400 megapixels and an awesome 8x OPTICAL zoom, equivalent to 35 - 300 mm in a 35mm film camera.. Around $350 on eBay. |
I assume you made it back home safely and affordably.
Maurice Naughton
Aug 16 2005, 12:27 PM
I did make it home safely. It cost me a small fortune. I'll be eating price-reduced veggies and drinking water with meals for quite a while.
Thanks for your inquiry.
bushey
Aug 16 2005, 12:33 PM
Several months ago I bought the Nikon Coolpix 5400 (5 megapixel, 8X optical zoom) new. There was a special rebate deal going on, so I was able to get it for around $250 net. Still trying to figure out all of the settings, etc. but I'm generally happy with it.
Adam
Aug 16 2005, 02:45 PM
I bought a Olympus C-750 UZ about 6 months( ~£150) ago and have been very happy with it. It has a 10x optical lens which I think is very important and also some other good functions, especially the macrofunction. Great for point and shoot.

This model is getting old, but I would recommend getting a camera with a good optical lens.
mcj
Aug 18 2005, 03:31 AM
| QUOTE (Maurice Naughton @ Aug 16 2005, 01:00 AM) |
| The Nikon Coolpix 4800 has 400 megapixels and an awesome 8x OPTICAL zoom, equivalent to 35 - 300 mm in a 35mm film camera.. Around $350 on eBay. |
I just checked the specs on
dpreview... it's only 4 megapixels, not 400.
A little caution is sometimes needed when using the numeric keypad.
I agree with a number of the posters here in that regardless of the number of bells and whistles a camera has, none of it means a damn thing if the lens is a piece of crap. If there are certain qualities that you would look for in an SLR camera, don't lower your standards because you're now looking at digital.
A hint about eBay that I learned from a co-worker (IF you're not concerned about getting a
local warranty): Get a camera from a reputable store in Japan. The models are are a year-or-so old by the time they are introduced to the North American market & the Japanese stores can't sell this "old" stuff locally anymore. Brand new, but old there. You might be able to save a couple hundred $$.
hollywood
Aug 18 2005, 03:36 AM
And the store would be?? People used to do this sort of thing with Nakamichi sound stuff. What's happened to them?
djk
Aug 18 2005, 04:14 AM
i live by dpreview - there's great professional and devoted amateur info.......which is how i found my beloved digital camera. i wanted to spend up to 500$ with battery etc included and ended up with a panasonic lumix. besides all the desired excellent attributes, it's got a huge screen, is very beautiful to look at (in black) and......has a leica lens. being an old leica fan, i was thrilled. it's a wonderful camera and there is also a slightly bigger version that would be great to have for more intensive photography but the smaller one is just that - small. so, fun to carry around everywhere.
hollywood
Aug 18 2005, 04:39 AM
| QUOTE (djk @ Aug 17 2005, 09:14 PM) |
| i live by dpreview - there's great professional and devoted amateur info.......which is how i found my beloved digital camera. i wanted to spend up to 500$ with battery etc included and ended up with a panasonic lumix. besides all the desired excellent attributes, it's got a huge screen, is very beautiful to look at (in black) and......has a leica lens. being an old leica fan, i was thrilled. it's a wonderful camera and there is also a slightly bigger version that would be great to have for more intensive photography but the smaller one is just that - small. so, fun to carry around everywhere. |
This is an FZ 15 or FZ 20? Or?
omnivorette
Aug 18 2005, 03:35 PM
My digital camera, a dinosaur at this point, is a Leica. I still love it. I believe that somebody else manufactured them for Leica at the time (Fuji?), but there are Leica components in it.
I would like to replace it with a smaller one at some point. Tell us more about yours, djk. I'm an old Leica fan too.
Maurice Naughton
Aug 18 2005, 07:37 PM
| QUOTE (Maurice Naughton @ Aug 16 2005, 01:00 AM) |
| The Nikon Coolpix 4800 has 400 megapixels and an awesome 8x OPTICAL zoom, equivalent to 35 - 300 mm in a 35mm film camera.. Around $350 on eBay. |
[QUOTE]=mjc I just checked the specs on
dpreview... it's only 4 megapixels, not 400.
A little caution is sometimes needed when using the numeric keypad.
Right you are, mcj. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks for the heads-up.
djk
Aug 18 2005, 11:40 PM
| QUOTE (omnivorette @ Aug 18 2005, 03:35 PM) |
My digital camera, a dinosaur at this point, is a Leica. I still love it. I believe that somebody else manufactured them for Leica at the time (Fuji?), but there are Leica components in it.
I would like to replace it with a smaller one at some point. Tell us more about yours, djk. I'm an old Leica fan too. |
the new one just came out - i got mine last fall and already there is a better version. the reason i think the newer one is better is that they added more low light capacity, (tho mine is quite good on that subject which is important to me as i do a lot of low light photography) and they fixed the only con i had - longer battery life. it's got an anti shake thing so that you can use it in lower light w/o a tripod much more so than a sony for instance. everyone that sees it is impressed by its photographs, the way it looks and especially the lcd screen - very clean and crisp and large - about 2.5" x 2". it's light and slips into a pocket easily which makes it fun for point and shoot. the bigger version - which is called something like fx-20 or 24 is too big for constant carrying but great for more serious work. the opticals are excellent for this size camera. when i did the research for $500 and under, the two that had the best stats were this one and one of the canons, i can't remember the model number. i basically read every word on the forums and the ratings on dp review until i was satisfied, and i asked at B&H for their opinion - fwiw. check it out, and look at the black! (also comes in silver and blue)....
Panasonic DMC-FX9
5.9 million effective pixels
6.4 million sensor photo detectors
35 mm - 105 mm (3x) zoom lens
Announced 20-Jul-05
omnivorette
Aug 19 2005, 01:36 AM
Thanks, thanks. One of the things I like about my Leica is that it looks so cool, I must admit. I'll check this out.
Lippy
Aug 19 2005, 01:54 AM
I am very interested in the anti-shake feature.
hollywood
Aug 19 2005, 02:32 AM
Now Panasonic's site says the FX9 is due in August. Meanwhile the FX8K seems to be $300.00 at J&R.
FaustianBargain
Aug 19 2005, 02:44 AM
| QUOTE (omnivorette @ Aug 18 2005, 03:35 PM) |
| I'm an old Leica fan too. |
aren't we all? if i can afford it, i'd throw all my digital cameras out of the window and settle for a Leica M6.
actually, i'd sell my soul and my first born for a M6. i'll even throw in my mother and mother-in-law as a bonus if I can get my hands on a Leica.
Squeat Mungry
Aug 19 2005, 02:51 AM
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 18 2005, 07:44 PM) |
| actually, i'd sell my soul and my first born for a M6. |
I'd say your screen name is well-chosen, then!
FaustianBargain
Aug 19 2005, 03:35 AM
| QUOTE (Squeat Mungry @ Aug 19 2005, 02:51 AM) |
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 18 2005, 07:44 PM) | | actually, i'd sell my soul and my first born for a M6. |
I'd say your screen name is well-chosen, then!
|
the advantage of housing multiple personalities is having several souls to sell.
pim
Aug 19 2005, 04:12 AM
Anyone has any experience with the
Canon EOS 20D? I really don't know much about cameras, digital or otherwise. Photography just seems like a fun subject to take on as a new hobby. Yes, so I am a dillettante, and one who wants a better toy.

A friend with a fancy photography degree has mentioned this one as a possibility. Anyone has it? How do you like it?
My little pocket one is the Sony DSC T1. A couple years old now but is still working just fine, I will keep using it when I want to be somewhat discrete with my activities.
pim
Aug 19 2005, 04:13 AM
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 17 2005, 12:44 AM) |
| actually, i'd sell my soul and my first born for a M6. i'll even throw in my mother and mother-in-law as a bonus if I can get my hands on a Leica. |
Ah, so that was it. I had been wondering what it was you bargained your soul for.
djk
Aug 19 2005, 04:21 AM
| QUOTE (hollywood @ Aug 19 2005, 02:32 AM) |
| Now Panasonic's site says the FX9 is due in August. Meanwhile the FX8K seems to be $300.00 at J&R. |
mine is the fx7 - purchased for $427 on amazon actually. (i had a gift certificate there so....) and that was last autumn. i'm pretty sure that the fx9 is avail but can't remember where i read that. check amazon just for an fyi....
FaustianBargain
Aug 19 2005, 04:33 AM
| QUOTE (pim @ Aug 19 2005, 04:13 AM) |
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 17 2005, 12:44 AM) | | actually, i'd sell my soul and my first born for a M6. i'll even throw in my mother and mother-in-law as a bonus if I can get my hands on a Leica. |
Ah, so that was it. I had been wondering what it was you bargained your soul for.
|
eos 20D is 8 something megapixels. you dont need that much and you need to have a super fast computer to process those images. also, its a dslr. your dslr is only as good as your lens. and your lens have to be fast. really really fast lens. and they cost more than the camera. seriously.
i dont use my dslr anymore. unless there is a good studio setting and i have a steady tripod(mine is a manfrotto and i think i have a 3130 fluid head). its a pain travelling with a heavy tripod and i find that monopods are better..altho' your luggage WILL be picked upon if you can carry anything that remotely resembles a tripod/monopod. better leave your checked in luggage unlocked. unless you want shredded luggage.
three megapixels > printed to a 20x30 poster.
8 megapixels > overkill imo.
re the bargains i have made> i could tell you stories, but i'll have to kill you later.
pim
Aug 19 2005, 04:45 AM
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 17 2005, 02:33 AM) |
| eos 20D is 8 something megapixels. you dont need that much and you need to have a super fast computer to process those images. also, its a dslr. your dslr is only as good as your lens. and your lens have to be fast. really really fast lens. and they cost more than the camera. seriously. |
I have a super fast computer.

I'm an ex-geek.
I'm thinking about
this lens for regular use, and perhaps a swanky macro lens (yet undecided) for close up shots of food or low light settings.
The mini Sony I have is already 5 MP, but I want to also play with other things like depth of field, etc.
What about the Canon Digital Rebel?
FaustianBargain
Aug 19 2005, 05:07 AM
| QUOTE (pim @ Aug 19 2005, 04:45 AM) |
| QUOTE (FaustianBargain @ Aug 17 2005, 02:33 AM) | | eos 20D is 8 something megapixels. you dont need that much and you need to have a super fast computer to process those images. also, its a dslr. your dslr is only as good as your lens. and your lens have to be fast. really really fast lens. and they cost more than the camera. seriously. |
I have a super fast computer.  I'm an ex-geek. I'm thinking about this lens for regular use, and perhaps a swanky macro lens (yet undecided) for close up shots of food or low light settings. The mini Sony I have is already 5 MP, but I want to also play with other things like depth of field, etc. What about the Canon Digital Rebel? |
i have that lens. well..it's not really a fast lens. and i think eos 20d has a focal length multiplier, unless i am mistaken. so 17 mm will be multiplied by 1.5x. effectively, you cant get any wide angle shots. and your fish eye lens, if you are rich enough to buy one, will be useless. digital rebel is a good entry level dslr.
dont buy from amazon. i only shop at
bhphotovideo.com and they have the best price. but you have to go to nyc or buy them online. the shipping kinda equals the nyc taxes, so either way is ok. but its more fun going to the nyc venue as they do have a lot of toys. and they have a good reputation and good service dept. the staff are also very helpful.
now, re macro lens..canon 100mm macro is a standard. almost L series at a reasonable price(500$ iirc). i like prime lenses(no zoom) as the images are crystal clear and sharp. for low light situations, you need a really fast lens(f/1...mmmmmmmmmm). canon has some cheap prime lenses(ok..so the glass is really plastic), but they are infinitely better than ultra posh ground glass zoom lenses. of course, this is just my opinion and i am cheap.
get a 50mm canon prime(check if there are any lesser than 50mm as the 50mm will actually be 75+mm with a dslr that is CMOS tech, iirc...) and attach close up filters(canon has a few good ones). they will work fine. you might have dof issues, but thats when you put them through adobe for cropping and snipping.
edited to add:
canon 50mm prime/macroor
canon 100mm/macro lensi have the latter and would recommend it. it's usm(ultra sonic motor) and will last you longer. but it is also my experience that ALL canon dslrs do better with lens in manual focus mode. i hope you dont wear glasses or if you do, prefer contact lens.
FaustianBargain
Aug 19 2005, 05:42 AM
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.