Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Digital camera recommendations
Mouthfuls > General > Good buys
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
SLBunge
QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 2 2007, 07:23 AM) *

QUOTE(bushey @ Feb 2 2007, 08:18 AM) *

Blondie, which model of the Lumix is equivalent? I was looking at some the other day and was very tempted to buy.

The LX2

Thanks for the link. I'm tempted. My point and shoot Canon does not do well with bright light conditions outdoors because of an inferior lens.
Blondie
QUOTE(SLBunge @ Feb 2 2007, 08:54 AM) *

QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 2 2007, 07:23 AM) *

QUOTE(bushey @ Feb 2 2007, 08:18 AM) *

Blondie, which model of the Lumix is equivalent? I was looking at some the other day and was very tempted to buy.

The LX2

Thanks for the link. I'm tempted. My point and shoot Cannon does not do well with bright light conditions outdoors because of an inferior lens.

That's why I got it. My Canon A95 was decent and fine for work, but I wasn't happy with the photos I took in Barcelona a few months back. That sealed the deal.
Lippy
Olympus has just announced a new model with a zoom lens equivalent of 28 - 500, image stabilization, and RAW. It will retail initially at $500. I'm eager to take a look at this one when it is available, maybe March.
Lippy
Here are the specs on the above-mentioned Olympus camera. The big question will be the image quality, of course. What interests me most is the range of that lens.
rockdoggydog
I would be very wary of a lens with that much range, usually it results in really soft images at the long end. The automatic ISO adjusting in low light will result in much grainier images than you may be prepared for, but it's a matter of getting used to the fact. The only other thing is that the relatively slow lens speed at zoom means it will be tough to use the lens for any sort of nature, sports, or action photography as it will not freeze action well. Other than that it looks like it might be a good camera for the price and compactness as long as the imaging processor is up to snuff.

Rocky
Lippy
I agree completely, but I'm eager to see what it can with architectural details and long street scenes, which are my primary uses.
cristina
Here's the Sony a100, the Alpha, that I've been using since October.

http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP....idigitalcameras

Here's a review:

http://www.dphotojournal.com/sony-alpha-ds...-sample-photos/

I am over the moon with this camera.

Lippy, I took the photo below with the lens full-out, from approximately one city block away.

IPB Image

and cropped it to this:

IPB Image

I am in love with the camera. It's not pocket-size, but I'm beyond caring.
Lippy
That's very nice, Cristina.
pim
QUOTE(Blondie @ Jan 31 2007, 09:55 AM) *

I'm looking forward to your impressions, Pim. I got myself the nearly-identical-but-cheaper Lumix version of the Leica (which, as you said, was completely unavailabale in the States) a few weeks ago, but haven't had much chance to play with it. Love what it's done so far, especially the 16:9 mode.


I'm liking it so far. I took it to the 'hippest art exhibit in London' last night, and it did quite well in dimly lit, or varyingly lit areas. Much better than I expected.

These shots are directly from the camera, shot in RAW, manual, and with no off camera white balance fix. That Leica lens rocks, no?
Considering the weird lighting at the scene, this is not bad at all for a tiny pocket camera, I think.

IPB Image
IPB Image
IPB Image
tanabutler
QUOTE(cristina @ Feb 2 2007, 11:59 AM) *

Here's the Sony a100, the Alpha, that I've been using since October.

http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP....idigitalcameras

Here's a review:

http://www.dphotojournal.com/sony-alpha-ds...-sample-photos/

I am over the moon with this camera.

Lippy, I took the photo below with the lens full-out, from approximately one city block away.

IPB Image

and cropped it to this:

IPB Image

I am in love with the camera. It's not pocket-size, but I'm beyond caring.

Cristina, I hope these are making it into the photography thread. (They may already be there: I'm just in late from a play, and this is the first thread I checked.)

This is a beautiful photo, and a great illustration of judicious cropping!
Blondie
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 3 2007, 02:39 AM) *

QUOTE(Blondie @ Jan 31 2007, 09:55 AM) *

I'm looking forward to your impressions, Pim. I got myself the nearly-identical-but-cheaper Lumix version of the Leica (which, as you said, was completely unavailabale in the States) a few weeks ago, but haven't had much chance to play with it. Love what it's done so far, especially the 16:9 mode.


I'm liking it so far. I took it to the 'hippest art exhibit in London' last night, and it did quite well in dimly lit, or varyingly lit areas. Much better than I expected.

These shots are directly from the camera, shot in RAW, manual, and with no off camera white balance fix. That Leica lens rocks, no?
Considering the weird lighting at the scene, this is not bad at all for a tiny pocket camera, I think.


Those look great. Is that a Mike Nelson installation?
Peter Creasey
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 3 2007, 01:39 AM) *
That Leica lens rocks, no?


Pim, speaking of Leica...

QUOTE
Subject: An Amazing Story out of Nazi Germany

>

>

> The Leica Freedom Train

>

>

> The Leica is the pioneer 35mm camera. It is a German

> product -precise, minimalist, and utterly efficient.

> Behind its worldwide acceptance as a creative tool

> was a family-owned, socially oriented firm that,

> during the Nazi era, acted with uncommon grace,

> generosity and modesty.

>

>

> E. Leitz Inc., designer and manufacturer of

> Germany's most famous photographic product, saved

> its Jews. Ernst Leitz II, the steely eyed

> Protestant patriarch who headed the closely held

> firm as the Holocaust loomed across Europe, acted in

> such a way as to earn the title, "the photography

> industry's Schindler."

>

>

> As soon as Adolf Hitler was named chancellor of

> Germany in 1933, Ernst Leitz II began receiving

> frantic calls from Jewish associates, asking for his

> help in getting them and their families out of the

> country. As Christians, Leitz and his family were

> immune to Nazi Germany's Nuremberg laws, which

> restricted the movement of Jews and limited their

> professional activities. To help his Jewish workers

> and colleagues, Leitz quietly established what has

> become known among historians of the Holocaust as

> "the Leica Freedom Train," a covert means of

> allowing Jews to leave Germany in the guise of Leitz

> employees being assigned overseas. Employees,

> retailers, family members, even friends of family

> members were "assigned" to Leitz sales offices in

> France, Britain, Hong Kong and the United States.

>

>

> Leitz's activities intensified after the

> Kristallnacht of November 1938, during which

> synagogues and Jewish shops were burned across

> Germany. Before long, German "employees" were

> disembarking from the ocean liner Bremen at a New

> York pier and making their way to the Manhattan

> office of Leitz Inc., where executives quickly found

> them jobs in the photographic industry. Each new

> arrival had around his or her neck the symbol of

> freedom - a new Leica. The refugees were paid a

> stipend until they could find work. Out of this

> migration came designers, repair technicians,

> salespeople, marketers and writers for the

> photographic press.

>

>

> Keeping the story quiet

>

>

> The "Leica Freedom Train" was at its height in 1938

> and early 1939, delivering groups of refugees to New

> York every few weeks. Then, with the invasion of

> Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, Germany closed its borders.

> By that time, hundreds of endangered Jews had

> escaped to America, thanks to the Leitzes' efforts.

>

>

> How did Ernst Leitz II and his staff get away with

> it?

>

>

> Leitz Inc. was an internationally recognized brand

> that reflected credit on the newly resurgent Reich.

> The company produced range-finders and other optical

> systems for the German military. Also, the Nazi

> government desperately needed hard currency from

> abroad, and Leitz's single biggest market for

> optical goods was the United States. Even so,

> members of the Leitz family and firm suffered for

> their good works. A top executive, Alfred Turk, was

> jailed for working to help Jews and freed only after

> the payment of a large bribe.

>

>

> Leitz's daughter, Elsie Kuhn-Leitz, was imprisoned

> by the Gestapo after she was caught at the border,

> helping Jewish women cross into Switzerland. She

> eventually was freed but endured rough treatment in

> the course of questioning She also fell under

> suspicion when she attempted to improve the living

> conditions of 700 to 800 Ukrainian slave laborers,

> all of them women, who had been assigned to work in

> the plant during the 1940s.

>

>

> After the war, Kuhn-Leitz received numerous honors

> for her humanitarian efforts, among them the

> Officier d'honneur des Palms Academic from France in

> 1965 and the Aristide Briand Medal from the European

> Academy in the 1970s.

>

>

> Why has no one told this story until now?

>

>

> According to the late Norman Lipton, a freelance

> writer and editor, the Leitz family wanted no

> publicity for its heroic efforts. Only after the

> last member of the Leitz family was dead did the

> "Leica Freedom Train" finally come to light.

>

>

> It is now the subject of a book, "The Greatest

> Invention of the Leitz Family: The Leica Freedom

> Train," by Frank Dabba Smith, a California-born

> rabbi currently living in England.


Lippy
I played with one of the Leicas at a book fair at Bryant Park in October and found it v-e-r-y tempting. There's something hypnotic about that red dot, isn't there! Nothing else says "quality" louder.
pim
QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 1 2007, 11:44 AM) *

Those look great. Is that a Mike Nelson installation?


Christoph Buchel actually. Quite an odd installation even for the Hauser & Wirth galleries blink.gif

It's a cross between an art installation and a fun house, where you climb into closets, freezers, or a refrigerator maze to get to things.

Fun.

Simply Botiful
pim
QUOTE(Lippy @ Feb 1 2007, 07:47 PM) *
There's something hypnotic about that red dot, isn't there! Nothing else says "quality" louder.


There certainly is. smile.gif
Blondie
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 3 2007, 06:20 PM) *

QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 1 2007, 11:44 AM) *

Those look great. Is that a Mike Nelson installation?


Christoph Buchel actually. Quite an odd installation even for the Hauser & Wirth galleries blink.gif

It's a cross between an art installation and a fun house, where you climb into closets, freezers, or a refrigerator maze to get to things.

Fun.

Simply Botiful

Looks like a blast.

I wish I'd had the patience to hold out for the Leica, but considering the price of the Lumix (as it includes the Leica lens), I'll be happy to get half as good results as you're getting smile.gif
Lippy
QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 4 2007, 03:45 PM) *

I wish I'd had the patience to hold out for the Leica, but considering the price of the Lumix (as it includes the Leica lens), I'll be happy to get half as good results as you're getting smile.gif


Leica makes a number of lenses (all of superb quality, to be sure). Is the lens on the Lumix the same as the one on the Leica?
Blondie
QUOTE(Lippy @ Feb 4 2007, 03:53 PM) *

QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 4 2007, 03:45 PM) *

I wish I'd had the patience to hold out for the Leica, but considering the price of the Lumix (as it includes the Leica lens), I'll be happy to get half as good results as you're getting smile.gif


Leica makes a number of lenses (all of superb quality, to be sure). Is the lens on the Lumix the same as the one on the Leica?

I'm told it is the same lens. The Leica does have a few features the Lumix doesn't, some extra white balance presets, etc., but it wasn't anything I thought a necessity for my purposes.
Robert Schonfeld
I've always been an slr guy, but those Leicas are gorgeous.

I understand Leitz will be making lenses for the Nikon digitals, but no autofocus.
SLBunge
QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 2 2007, 07:59 AM) *

QUOTE(SLBunge @ Feb 2 2007, 08:54 AM) *

QUOTE(Blondie @ Feb 2 2007, 07:23 AM) *

QUOTE(bushey @ Feb 2 2007, 08:18 AM) *

Blondie, which model of the Lumix is equivalent? I was looking at some the other day and was very tempted to buy.

The LX2

Thanks for the link. I'm tempted. My point and shoot Cannon does not do well with bright light conditions outdoors because of an inferior lens.

That's why I got it. My Canon A95 was decent and fine for work, but I wasn't happy with the photos I took in Barcelona a few months back. That sealed the deal.

I sent the specs to a longtime friend who is a photo whore and her only comment about cons was "only a small range of apertures...you'll never have a landscape where everything is in focus".

Pim's photos don't suggest this (assuming the lens is the same). Is this something you've noticed?
Blondie
QUOTE(SLBunge @ Feb 5 2007, 12:14 PM) *


I sent the specs to a longtime friend who is a photo whore and her only comment about cons was "only a small range of apertures...you'll never have a landscape where everything is in focus".

Pim's photos don't suggest this (assuming the lens is the same). Is this something you've noticed?

I haven't noticed that, but I haven't really put it through the paces yet. I did just look at a whole slew of photos my boss took with his Leica on a location scout, NYC skylines and some shots of Huntington Harbor, and they looked very good, far better than my Canon.
pim
I'm putting my Leica through its paces and still quite happy with the photos I have so far. I've noticed a few things though. The main thing is I seem to have lost an ability to hold a tiny camera steadily. Has anyone noticed that when switching back to a pocket cam from a DSLR or a SLR? I've got more blurry pictures than I've had in a long time, and I know it's not a problem with the camera's autofocus, since the next shot would come out just fine.

The Leica is great for people who know a little something about aperture or shutter speed and whatnot. There are a few auto options, but the choices are somewhat bizarre. There's no completely auto mode where the camera figures out everything, for one. But there's an auto mode called 'starry night' for shooting, yes, starry nights. I don't know about you but I don't often take photos of starry nights dry.gif
Peter Creasey
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 03:06 PM) *
hold a tiny camera steadily.


Pim, Some higher end cameras are now featuring the image stabilizer capability. You might find this Image Stabilizer Demonstration at the Canon Site of interest (NOTE: scroll down and click on the demonstation panel.)

rockdoggydog
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 01:06 PM) *

I'm putting my Leica through its paces and still quite happy with the photos I have so far. I've noticed a few things though. The main thing is I seem to have lost an ability to hold a tiny camera steadily. Has anyone noticed that when switching back to a pocket cam from a DSLR or a SLR? I've got more blurry pictures than I've had in a long time, and I know it's not a problem with the camera's autofocus, since the next shot would come out just fine.



It takes me a while to readjust, especially after I've been shooting action shots or have been using an image stabilized lens recently. It just has to re-enter my consciousness to make sure my hand is steady.

Rocky
pim
QUOTE(Peter Creasey @ Feb 3 2007, 07:17 PM) *

Pim, Some higher end cameras are now featuring the image stabilizer capability.


um...I just bought a Leica dry.gif

Actually, Rocky had it right, it's just about re-adjusting. The balance for a tiny camera is completely different from holding big DSLR. For example, I have to remind myself not to push the shutter button so hard.

Back when I just had a tiny Sony DSC T-1 as my only camera, I had less trouble focusing with it than when I was using it as a rarely-used second camera to my DSLR.
Ron Johnson
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 04:41 PM) *

QUOTE(Peter Creasey @ Feb 3 2007, 07:17 PM) *

Pim, Some higher end cameras are now featuring the image stabilizer capability.


um...I just bought a Leica dry.gif




which one? I have been coveting a Leica for months now . . .
porkwah
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 03:06 PM) *
hold a tiny camera steadily.




sometimes with my small elph, i hold it against my head as if it had an optical viewfinder when i take the picture. looks a bit odd, but it really does stabilize the image.

i went on two trips this summer: japan and mexico. the canon elph did great in japan but not so well in mexico. couldn't handle the light.
mcj
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 04:06 PM) *
But there's an auto mode called 'starry night' for shooting, yes, starry nights. I don't know about you but I don't often take photos of starry nights dry.gif

I wonder if this is similar to the mode on my new Canon PowerShot S3 IS for night snapshots? It tries to balance the flash exposure on the subject with the ambient exposure of the background, but it'll need a tripod.


As for holding a tiny camera steadily, the same techniques apply as when using an SLR, but more so. An SLR is a bit more stable simply because it's mass resists motion. Less mass, less resistance. In addition to bracing the camera, holding your breath, gently squeezing the shutter, etc., since there are few automatic settings on your Leica, you still have the option of using the higher shutter speeds. Shutter speeds between 1/30 - 1/8 sec can be braced (normal to wide angle shots; use a wall, tabletop, whatever's available), but anything slower should be taken using a tripod. Other than that, as you said, "it's just about re-adjusting".
pim
Blondie, does the Lumix has a 'food' mode? Saw it on the Leica and just had to try it.

Here's a shot from the dinner yesterday at Lao Thai in the 13e. The restaurant was brightly lit in places. The shot was taken with the auto 'food' mode, auto white balance, everything. The shot was taken in jpg, and here it is with no off camera tweak whatsoever. (BTW, the 'white' part of the blue and white plate was tinted a little blue in real life too.)

IPB Image

Here's another one, same auto 'food' mode, no tweak here either. Caille à l'ail.

IPB Image
FaustianBargain
pim, is this the m8?

eta: re image stabilisers, i have only seen it in telephoto lenses. are they installing it in digital cameras too these days? these days, i simply turn it off and use the MF.

dear pim, leica digital be damned...smile.gif...just go for the M6. sometimes, one should resist the temptation to mess around with a classic.
FaustianBargain
IPB Image
(digital)

good old canon

IPB Image
(kodachrome)
but digital can never equal 'analog' cameras. ever.

so seriously, if you can afford to snag a m6, do so. god knows i will if i could.
pim
QUOTE(FaustianBargain @ Feb 4 2007, 06:06 AM) *

pim, is this the m8?

eta: re image stabilisers, i have only seen it in telephoto lenses. are they installing it in digital cameras too these days? these days, i simply turn it off and use the MF.

dear pim, leica digital be damned...smile.gif...just go for the M6. sometimes, one should resist the temptation to mess around with a classic.


No, this is the Leica D-Lux3. The smallest of the Leica that will still allow shooting in RAW format and manual adjustment of aperture and shutter speed etc. Digital of course. I'm a web kinda girl wink.gif

The D-Lux3 actually has manual focus, but with no optical viewfinder I'm not sure how to manage it. blink.gif
Lippy
My Canon A-610 has manual focus, but even with a viewfinder, it doesn't work the same way a film camera does. A portion of the scene is maginifed on the display and you use one of the buttons to adjust distance accordingly. I would call it manual focus simulator, rather than true manuall focus.

Your camera is the one I played with at Bryant Park a few months ago. (I also played with the current Leica film model. It was the heaviest camera I've ever held -- very amusing to think that it was considered light when its predecessor was introduced.
Adam Lawrence
Can any kind soul give me a very brief guide to the entry-level DSLR options?
Blondie
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 6 2007, 02:51 AM) *

Blondie, does the Lumix has a 'food' mode? Saw it on the Leica and just had to try it.

Here's a shot from the dinner yesterday at Lao Thai in the 13e. The restaurant was brightly lit in places. The shot was taken with the auto 'food' mode, auto white balance, everything. The shot was taken in jpg, and here it is with no off camera tweak whatsoever. (BTW, the 'white' part of the blue and white plate was tinted a little blue in real life too.)

Nice photos! Yes, the Lumix does have food mode, but I haven't had tried it yet. Unfortunately, the only food I'll see until WD-50 this weekend is the craft service table at work. For what it's worth, my boss, the production designer, loves his Leica D-Lux3 and the art director covets it smile.gif
Melonious Thunk
When I feel like I want to channel Cappa, (not that I can come close) I take this lovely machine with me. Unfortunately, digital convenience, in music and photography is very seductive and often wins out. But for B&W, it's hard to beat the classic Rollei.

IPB Image

IPB Image
Lippy
QUOTE(Adam Lawrence @ Feb 6 2007, 08:38 AM) *

Can any kind soul give me a very brief guide to the entry-level DSLR options?


Take a look at dpreview
Melonious Thunk
QUOTE(Lippy @ Feb 6 2007, 09:03 AM) *

QUOTE(Adam Lawrence @ Feb 6 2007, 08:38 AM) *

Can any kind soul give me a very brief guide to the entry-level DSLR options?


Take a look at dpreview

That is the best source, Lippy. I am still fence-sitting on a new digiSLR. Decided to buy Japanese knives instead for now. laugh.gif

I am impressed with the picture Christina posted from her new Sony with image stabilization. Wow!
Peter Creasey
QUOTE(pim @ Feb 5 2007, 03:41 PM) *

QUOTE(Peter Creasey @ Feb 3 2007, 07:17 PM) *

Pim, Some higher end cameras are now featuring the image stabilizer capability.


um...I just bought a Leica


Pim, As I expected, your Leica D-Lux 3 has Image Stabilization. I just pointed you toward the Canon demonstration of Image Stabilization because I thought you (and others) might find it interesting.

Here are some various particulars about OIS on your camera...

QUOTE
This new camera (based on the Panasonic LX-2) has a ten megapixel 16:9 ratio CCD, Leica 4x wide angle optical zoom lens (28 to 112 mm equiv.) with optical image stabilization and a 2.8" 16:9 ratio LCD monitor. (While this camera is based on the LX-2 it has had image processing adjustments as defined by Leica).

Image stabilization Optical, 2 modes

The image stabilizer (O.I.S.) leads to sharply focused images even in situations where there's not really enough natural light.


cristina
QUOTE(Melonious Thunk @ Feb 6 2007, 08:11 AM) *

QUOTE(Lippy @ Feb 6 2007, 09:03 AM) *

QUOTE(Adam Lawrence @ Feb 6 2007, 08:38 AM) *

Can any kind soul give me a very brief guide to the entry-level DSLR options?


Take a look at dpreview

That is the best source, Lippy. I am still fence-sitting on a new digiSLR. Decided to buy Japanese knives instead for now. laugh.gif

I am impressed with the picture Christina posted from her new Sony with image stabilization. Wow!

Thunk, that's the highest praise. Thank you so much. This Sony A100 DSLR is a dream in low light, too.

Here's another photo, this one taken inside Santo Domingo church in San Cristóbal de las Casas. Existing light, no flash, image stabilization thingie turned on.

IPB Image

And another. This one I took just around the corner from my house. I was stopped at a traffic light, opened the car door, stuck the camera out the door and clicked.

IPB Image
Lippy
I still love my camera, but I was it had image stabilization and an 28mm wide angle equivalent at the low end of the zoom. My next one will.
Robert Schonfeld
Robert Capa (one "p"), one of my heroes, used Leica, Contax and Nikon. The Rollei, a terrific camera (I had one just like yours) would have been ungainly for his line of work.
Melonious Thunk
QUOTE(Robert Schonfeld @ Feb 6 2007, 10:08 AM) *

Robert Capa (one "p"), one of my heroes, used Leica, Contax and Nikon. The Rollei, a terrific camera (I had one just like yours) would have been ungainly for his line of work.

I stand corrected on both counts. Who was the guy I recall with the Rollei? I have this image of a rugged looking guy with dark curly hair and intense eyes, in his late 30s early 40s, cigarette hanging from the side of his mouth, taking pictures in action situations with a Rollei. I thought I saw that on the Capa biography that was shown on WNET recently.

Oh well, fantasies don't have to be historically accurate, do they?
Rebecca
QUOTE(cristina @ Feb 6 2007, 06:36 AM) *

This Sony A100 DSLR is a dream in low light, too.

These pictures are stunning. I want a camera like yours. Oh, fairy Godmother, please! The B&H catalog has several Sony A100 versions with and without flash etc., from $699 to $1200. Cristina, again, which to pick?
tanabutler
QUOTE(Rebecca @ Feb 6 2007, 10:31 AM) *

QUOTE(cristina @ Feb 6 2007, 06:36 AM) *

This Sony A100 DSLR is a dream in low light, too.

These pictures are stunning. I want a camera like yours. Oh, fairy Godmother, please! The B&H catalog has several Sony A100 versions with and without flash etc., from $699 to $1200. Cristina, again, which to pick?

Don't get a Canon. Suckiest customer service on the planet. (I owned five of them, and never again. I'm a solid Nikon girl now.)

I love the colors: it's all about the sensor. (And the D80 has it, not as expensive as the D200.)

These are my Christmas ornaments.

IPB Image
pim
QUOTE(Lippy @ Feb 4 2007, 12:44 PM) *

I still love my camera, but I was it had image stabilization and an 28mm wide angle equivalent at the low end of the zoom. My next one will.


If you are looking for a camera with zoom, don't be fooled by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7. Even with the Leica lens, that camera does horribly in low light -apparently the long zoom in this case meant a tiny light receptor. A friend of mine in Paris has one, and she's not happy with it at all. She had to buy another camera just to use in lower light settings, in fact.
Robert Schonfeld
QUOTE(Melonious Thunk @ Feb 6 2007, 12:03 PM) *

QUOTE(Robert Schonfeld @ Feb 6 2007, 10:08 AM) *

Robert Capa (one "p"), one of my heroes, used Leica, Contax and Nikon. The Rollei, a terrific camera (I had one just like yours) would have been ungainly for his line of work.

I stand corrected on both counts. Who was the guy I recall with the Rollei? I have this image of a rugged looking guy with dark curly hair and intense eyes, in his late 30s early 40s, cigarette hanging from the side of his mouth, taking pictures in action situations with a Rollei. I thought I saw that on the Capa biography that was shown on WNET recently.

Oh well, fantasies don't have to be historically accurate, do they?


That could be the great police photographer and chronicler of the New York scene, Weegee, aka Arthur Fellig.
Melonious Thunk
QUOTE(Robert Schonfeld @ Feb 6 2007, 05:51 PM) *

QUOTE(Melonious Thunk @ Feb 6 2007, 12:03 PM) *

QUOTE(Robert Schonfeld @ Feb 6 2007, 10:08 AM) *

Robert Capa (one "p"), one of my heroes, used Leica, Contax and Nikon. The Rollei, a terrific camera (I had one just like yours) would have been ungainly for his line of work.

I stand corrected on both counts. Who was the guy I recall with the Rollei? I have this image of a rugged looking guy with dark curly hair and intense eyes, in his late 30s early 40s, cigarette hanging from the side of his mouth, taking pictures in action situations with a Rollei. I thought I saw that on the Capa biography that was shown on WNET recently.

Oh well, fantasies don't have to be historically accurate, do they?


That could be the great police photographer and chronicler of the New York scene, Weegee, aka Arthur Fellig.


According to Wikipedia "Most of his notable photographs were taken with very basic press photographer equipment and methods of the era, a 4x5 Speed Graphic camera preset at f/16, @ 1/200 of a second with flashbulbs and a set focal length of ten feet."

I'll keep the Capa image. After all, he was making it with Ingrid Bergman.
Stone
It ain't the arrow. It's the indian.
pim
Continuing to explore my Leica, here's a shot with the Night Scenery mode, from the walk 'home' just now. Very low lighting, and, of coures, no tripod.

IPB Image

Not awful.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.